目标：探索深度学习算法进一步简化和优化尿道板（UP）质量评估的能力，使用板客观评分工具（POST），旨在提高Hypospadias修复中提高评估的客观性和可重复性。方法：五个关键的邮政地标是由专家在691图像数据集中的专家标记，该数据集接受了原发性杂质修复的青春期前男孩。然后，该数据集用于开发和验证基于深度学习的地标检测模型。提出的框架始于瞥见和检测，其中输入图像是使用预测的边界框裁剪的。接下来，使用深层卷积神经网络（CNN）体系结构来预测五个邮政标记的坐标。然后，这些预测的地标用于评估远端催化性远端的质量。结果：所提出的模型准确地定位了gan区域，平均平均精度（地图）为99.5％，总体灵敏度为99.1％。在预测地标的坐标时，达到了0.07152的归一化平均误差（NME），平均平方误差（MSE）为0.001，在0.1 nme的阈值下为20.2％的故障率。结论：此深度学习应用程序在使用邮政评估质量时表现出鲁棒性和高精度。使用国际多中心基于图像的数据库进行进一步评估。外部验证可以使深度学习算法受益，并导致更好的评估，决策和对手术结果的预测。

快速准确地检测该疾病可以大大帮助减少任何国家医疗机构对任何大流行期间死亡率降低死亡率的压力。这项工作的目的是使用新型的机器学习框架创建多模式系统，该框架同时使用胸部X射线（CXR）图像和临床数据来预测COVID-19患者的严重程度。此外，该研究还提出了一种基于nom图的评分技术，用于预测高危患者死亡的可能性。这项研究使用了25种生物标志物和CXR图像，以预测意大利第一波Covid-19（3月至6月2020年3月至6月）在930名Covid-19患者中的风险。提出的多模式堆叠技术分别产生了89.03％，90.44％和89.03％的精度，灵敏度和F1分数，以识别低风险或高危患者。与CXR图像或临床数据相比，这种多模式方法可提高准确性6％。最后，使用多元逻辑回归的列线图评分系统 - 用于对第一阶段确定的高风险患者的死亡风险进行分层。使用随机森林特征选择模型将乳酸脱氢酶（LDH），O2百分比，白细胞（WBC）计数，年龄和C反应蛋白（CRP）鉴定为有用的预测指标。开发了五个预测因素参数和基于CXR图像的列函数评分，以量化死亡的概率并将其分为两个风险组：分别存活（<50％）和死亡（> = 50％）。多模式技术能够预测F1评分为92.88％的高危患者的死亡概率。开发和验证队列曲线下的面积分别为0.981和0.939。

心血管疾病是世界各地最常见的死亡原因。为了检测和治疗心脏相关的疾病，需要连续血压（BP）监测以及许多其他参数。为此目的开发了几种侵入性和非侵入性方法。用于持续监测BP的医院中使用的大多数现有方法是侵入性的。相反，基于袖带的BP监测方法，可以预测收缩压（SBP）和舒张压（DBP），不能用于连续监测。几项研究试图从非侵​​入性可收集信号（例如光学肌谱（PPG）和心电图（ECG））预测BP，其可用于连续监测。在这项研究中，我们探讨了自动化器在PPG和ECG信号中预测BP的适用性。在12,000岁的MIMIC-II数据集中进行了调查，发现了一个非常浅的一维AutoEncoder可以提取相关功能，以预测与最先进的SBP和DBP在非常大的数据集上的性能。从模拟-II数据集的一部分的独立测试分别为SBP和DBP提供了2.333和0.713的MAE。在40个主题的外部数据集上，模型在MIMIC-II数据集上培训，分别为SBP和DBP提供2.728和1.166的MAE。对于这种情况来说，结果达到了英国高血压协会（BHS）A级并超越了目前文学的研究。

在医疗诊断的世界中，采用各种深度学习技术是非常普遍的，也是有效的，并且当涉及到视网膜光学相干断层扫描（OCT）行业时，其陈述同样是正确的，但（i）这些技术有防止医疗专业人员完全信任的黑匣子特征（ii）这些方法的缺乏精度限制了它们在临床和复杂病例中的实施（iii）OCT分类上的现有工程和模型基本上是大而复杂，它们需要相当大量的内存和计算能力，从而降低实时应用中分类器的质量。为了满足这些问题，在本文中，提出了一种自我开发的CNN模型，而且使用石灰的使用相对较小，更简单，引入了可解释的AI对研究，并有助于提高模型的可解释性。此外，此外将成为医疗专家的资产，以获得主要和详细信息，并将帮助他们做出最终决策，并将降低传统深度学习模式的不透明度和脆弱性。

目前在线视频游戏已成为逐步最喜欢的娱乐和反击来源：全球攻势（CS：Go）是全球上市的在线第一人称射击游戏之一。通过Esports每年安排许多竞争游戏。尽管如此，（i）没有关于CS的视频分析和行动认可的研究：GO游戏 - 游戏，可以在游戏行业中发挥重要作用，以进行预测模型（ii）在实时申请中没有完成任何工作在CS的行动和结果上：GO匹配（III）匹配的游戏数据通常在HLTV中可用作CSV格式化文件，但它没有开放访问，HLTV倾向于阻止用户采取数据。此手稿旨在开发一种用于精确预测4种不同行动的模型，并与我们的自主开发的深神经网络相比，与我们的自我开发的深神经网络相比，识别最佳型号，并在后面的主要投票包括有资格提供实时预测和该模型的结果有助于建设自动收集和处理更多数据的自动化系统，并解决从HLTV收集数据的问题。

The latent space of autoencoders has been improved for clustering image data by jointly learning a t-distributed embedding with a clustering algorithm inspired by the neighborhood embedding concept proposed for data visualization. However, multivariate tabular data pose different challenges in representation learning than image data, where traditional machine learning is often superior to deep tabular data learning. In this paper, we address the challenges of learning tabular data in contrast to image data and present a novel Gaussian Cluster Embedding in Autoencoder Latent Space (G-CEALS) algorithm by replacing t-distributions with multivariate Gaussian clusters. Unlike current methods, the proposed approach independently defines the Gaussian embedding and the target cluster distribution to accommodate any clustering algorithm in representation learning. A trained G-CEALS model extracts a quality embedding for unseen test data. Based on the embedding clustering accuracy, the average rank of the proposed G-CEALS method is 1.4 (0.7), which is superior to all eight baseline clustering and cluster embedding methods on seven tabular data sets. This paper shows one of the first algorithms to jointly learn embedding and clustering to improve multivariate tabular data representation in downstream clustering.

Deep learning methods in the literature are invariably benchmarked on image data sets and then assumed to work on all data problems. Unfortunately, architectures designed for image learning are often not ready or optimal for non-image data without considering data-specific learning requirements. In this paper, we take a data-centric view to argue that deep image embedding clustering methods are not equally effective on heterogeneous tabular data sets. This paper performs one of the first studies on deep embedding clustering of seven tabular data sets using six state-of-the-art baseline methods proposed for image data sets. Our results reveal that the traditional clustering of tabular data ranks second out of eight methods and is superior to most deep embedding clustering baselines. Our observation is in line with the recent literature that traditional machine learning of tabular data is still a competitive approach against deep learning. Although surprising to many deep learning researchers, traditional clustering methods can be competitive baselines for tabular data, and outperforming these baselines remains a challenge for deep embedding clustering. Therefore, deep learning methods for image learning may not be fair or suitable baselines for tabular data without considering data-specific contrasts and learning requirements.

Pruning refers to the elimination of trivial weights from neural networks. The sub-networks within an overparameterized model produced after pruning are often called Lottery tickets. This research aims to generate winning lottery tickets from a set of lottery tickets that can achieve similar accuracy to the original unpruned network. We introduce a novel winning ticket called Cyclic Overlapping Lottery Ticket (COLT) by data splitting and cyclic retraining of the pruned network from scratch. We apply a cyclic pruning algorithm that keeps only the overlapping weights of different pruned models trained on different data segments. Our results demonstrate that COLT can achieve similar accuracies (obtained by the unpruned model) while maintaining high sparsities. We show that the accuracy of COLT is on par with the winning tickets of Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) and, at times, is better. Moreover, COLTs can be generated using fewer iterations than tickets generated by the popular Iterative Magnitude Pruning (IMP) method. In addition, we also notice COLTs generated on large datasets can be transferred to small ones without compromising performance, demonstrating its generalizing capability. We conduct all our experiments on Cifar-10, Cifar-100 & TinyImageNet datasets and report superior performance than the state-of-the-art methods.

Semi-supervised learning (SSL) has made significant strides in the field of remote sensing. Finding a large number of labeled datasets for SSL methods is uncommon, and manually labeling datasets is expensive and time-consuming. Furthermore, accurately identifying remote sensing satellite images is more complicated than it is for conventional images. Class-imbalanced datasets are another prevalent phenomenon, and models trained on these become biased towards the majority classes. This becomes a critical issue with an SSL model's subpar performance. We aim to address the issue of labeling unlabeled data and also solve the model bias problem due to imbalanced datasets while achieving better accuracy. To accomplish this, we create "artificial" labels and train a model to have reasonable accuracy. We iteratively redistribute the classes through resampling using a distribution alignment technique. We use a variety of class imbalanced satellite image datasets: EuroSAT, UCM, and WHU-RS19. On UCM balanced dataset, our method outperforms previous methods MSMatch and FixMatch by 1.21% and 0.6%, respectively. For imbalanced EuroSAT, our method outperforms MSMatch and FixMatch by 1.08% and 1%, respectively. Our approach significantly lessens the requirement for labeled data, consistently outperforms alternative approaches, and resolves the issue of model bias caused by class imbalance in datasets.

The extent to which men and women use language differently has been questioned previously. Finding clear and consistent gender differences in language is not conclusive in general, and the research is heavily influenced by the context and method employed to identify the difference. In addition, the majority of the research was conducted in written form, and the sample was collected in writing. Therefore, we compared the word choices of male and female presenters in public addresses such as TED lectures. The frequency of numerous types of words, such as parts of speech (POS), linguistic, psychological, and cognitive terms were analyzed statistically to determine how male and female speakers use words differently. Based on our data, we determined that male speakers use specific types of linguistic, psychological, cognitive, and social words in considerably greater frequency than female speakers.